Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 31 Aug 2016 (this version), latest version 14 Dec 2017 (v2)]
Title:Better-Than-Chance Classification for Signal Detection
View PDFAbstract:We show that using a classifier's accuracy as a test statistic, is underpowered for the purpose of finding a difference between populations, compared to a bona-fide statistical test. It is also more complicated to implement, so that a statistical test should be preferred. For the cases that the goal of the test is not the existence of a difference between populations, but the actual classification ability, we suggest several improvements to the classification accuracy, to increase its power against a "pure chance" null.
Submission history
From: Jonathan Rosenblatt [view email][v1] Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:15:38 UTC (348 KB)
[v2] Thu, 14 Dec 2017 06:45:38 UTC (364 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.