Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods
[Submitted on 5 Jan 2016 (this version), latest version 29 Oct 2016 (v3)]
Title:Limits to causal inference with state-space reconstruction for infectious disease
View PDFAbstract:Infectious diseases are notorious for their complex dynamics, which make it difficult to fit models and test hypotheses. Methods based on state-space reconstruction have been claimed to infer causal interactions in noisy, nonlinear dynamical systems without the need for an underlying model. These "model-free" methods are collectively known as convergent cross-mapping (CCM). Although CCM has theoretical support, natural systems routinely violate its assumptions. To identify the practical limits of causal inference under CCM, we simulated the dynamics of two pathogen strains with varying interaction strengths. Traditional CCM is extremely sensitive to periodic fluctuations, often inferring interactions between independent strains that oscillate with similar frequencies. This sensitivity vanishes with alternative criteria for inferring causality, which can identify the correct direction of interactions between strains that are nearly identical. However, CCM in general is sensitive to high levels of process noise and deviations from steady-state dynamics. This sensitivity is problematic because methods to gauge noise and non-steady-state behavior in natural systems, including the quality of reconstructed attractors that underlie cross-mapping, are not well developed. We illustrate these challenges by analyzing time series of six reportable childhood infections in New York City and Chicago during the pre-vaccine era. The inconsistent results suggest that noise and nonequilibrium behavior may be pervasive obstacles to the application of causal inference based on state-space reconstruction in natural systems.
Submission history
From: Edward Baskerville [view email][v1] Tue, 5 Jan 2016 02:14:11 UTC (1,029 KB)
[v2] Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:37:23 UTC (2,296 KB)
[v3] Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:19:59 UTC (2,428 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.