Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 15 Nov 2015 (this version), latest version 14 Oct 2016 (v4)]
Title:Incorporating Astrophysical Systematics into a Generalized Likelihood for Cosmology with Type Ia Supernovae
View PDFAbstract:Traditional cosmological inference using Type Ia supernovae (SNeIa) have used stretch- and color-corrected fits of SN Ia light curves and assumed a resulting fiducial mean and symmetric intrinsic dispersion to the resulting relative luminosity. However, the recent literature has presented mounting evidence that SNeIa have different width-color-corrected luminosities, depending on the environment in which they are found. Such correlations suggest the existence of multiple populations of SNeIa and a non-Gaussian distribution of relative luminosity. We introduce a framework that provides a generalized full-likelihood approach to accommodate multiple populations with unknown population parameters. To illustrate this framework we use a simple model of two populations with a relative shift, independent intrinsic dispersions, and linear redshift evolution of the relative fraction of each population. We generate mock SN Ia data sets from an underlying two-population model and use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to quantify biases on cosmological parameters induced by modeling a two-population data set with a one-population model for the distance-redshift relation. Treating observationally viable two-population mock data using a one-population model results in an inferred dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ that is biased by roughly 2 times its statistical error for a sample of N>~2500 SNeIa. Modeling the two-population data with a two-population model removes this bias at a cost of an approximately ~20% increase in the statistical constraint on $w$. These significant biases can be realized even if the support for two underlying SNeIa populations, in the form of model selection criteria, is inconclusive. With the current observationally-estimated difference in the two proposed populations, a sample of N>~10,000 SNeIa is necessary to yield conclusive evidence of two populations.
Submission history
From: Kara Ponder [view email][v1] Sun, 15 Nov 2015 03:17:29 UTC (360 KB)
[v2] Fri, 20 Nov 2015 21:02:08 UTC (360 KB)
[v3] Thu, 12 May 2016 22:02:54 UTC (364 KB)
[v4] Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:58:14 UTC (357 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.