Title:Intellectual interchanges in the history of massive online open-editing encyclopedia, Wikipedia

Abstract:Wikipedia is a free Internet encyclopedia with enormous amount of contents. This encyclopedia is written by volunteers with various backgrounds in a collective fashion; anyone can access and edit most of the articles. This open editing nature may give us prejudice that Wikipedia is unstable and unreliable sources; yet many studies suggest that Wikipedia is even more accurate and self-consistent than traditional encyclopedias. Scholars have attempted to understand such extraordinary credibility, but usually used the number of edits as the unit of time, without consideration of real-time. In this work, we probe the formation of such collective intelligence through the systematic analysis using the entire history of 34,534,110 English Wikipedia articles, between 2001 and 2014. From this massive data set, we observe the universality of both timewise and lengthwise editing scales, which suggests that it is essential to consider the real-time dynamics. By considering real-time, we find the existence of distinct growth patterns that are unobserved by utilizing the number of edits as the unit of time. To account these results, we present a mechanistic model that adopts both the article editing dynamics based on editor-editor and editor-article interactions. The model successfully generates key properties of the real Wikipedia articles such as distinct types of articles for the editing patterns characterized by the interrelationship between the numbers of edits and editors, and the article size. In addition, the model indicates that infrequently referred articles tend to grow faster than frequently referred one, and articles attracting high motivation of edit counterintuitively reduce the number of participants. We suggest that this decay of participants eventually brings inequality among the editors, which will become more severe with time.