Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition
[Submitted on 18 Aug 2015 (this version), latest version 24 Mar 2016 (v5)]
Title:On Contextuality in Behavioral Data
View PDFAbstract:Dzhafarov, Zhang, and Kujala (arXiv:1504.07422) reviewed several behavioral data sets imitating the formal design of the quantum-mechanical contextuality experiments (such as EPR-Bell or Leggett-Garg ones), the conclusion was that contextuality was not present in any of these data sets. Aerts and Sozzo recently announced a new experiment (arXiv:1508.00434) whose results, they claimed, prove the presence of contextuality of the EPR-Bell type (entanglement) in conceptual combinations. We show that their experimental data exhibit no contextuality in the sense of the general definition of contextuality proposed in Dzhafarov, Kujala, and Larsson (Foundation of Physics 7, 762-782, 2015), while the traditional, narrow definition of contextuality does not apply to their data because they violate the condition of consistent connectedness (also known as marginal selectivity, no-signaling condition, no-disturbance principle, etc.). To circumvent the latter problem Aerts and Sozzo transform their experimental data using a computational procedure that makes all marginal probabilities equal to one half. We argue that this procedure is unjustifiable. It only works because it turns out to be a special version of the "depolarization" procedure described by Masanes, Acin, and Gisin (Physical Review A 73, 012112, 2006). Because this "correction" of probabilities is universally applicable, a definition of contextuality that would allow it would amount to simply ignoring marginal probabilities altogether. This would make the concept of contextuality trivial if not entirely empty.
Submission history
From: Ehtibar Dzhafarov [view email][v1] Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:01:06 UTC (11 KB)
[v2] Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:06:13 UTC (21 KB)
[v3] Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:35:12 UTC (22 KB)
[v4] Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:20:25 UTC (22 KB)
[v5] Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:10:45 UTC (22 KB)
Current browse context:
q-bio.NC
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.