Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods
[Submitted on 14 Aug 2015 (this version), latest version 17 Jun 2016 (v2)]
Title:A solution to the high bias in estimates of carbon held in tropical forest above-ground biomass
View PDFAbstract:Non-destructive methods were used to estimate the volume, aerial biomass and amount of carbon stored by individuals of different plant species, communities, vegetation types and coverage based on using elemental information capture, three-dimensional architecture and recurrent neural networks. This methodology accurately captures the diversity of plant forms present in plots or releves. The calculation of stored carbon in a vegetation type is a result from half the estimates of the biomass of sampled individuals in significant plots by the use of allometric formulas. The most complete formulas incorporate the diameter, height and specific gravity of trees but do not consider the variation in carbon stored in different organs or different species as well as exclude information on the wide variety of architectures present in different plant communities. To develop an allometric model, many individuals of different species must be sacrificed for the identification processes, validation and error minimization. It is common to find cutting-edge studies in which logging is encouraged to improve estimates of carbon. In this study, we replace this destructive methodology and provide an important contribution to quantifying global aboveground carbon. We have demonstrated with our methodology that carbon content in forest above-ground biomass in the pantropic could rise to 723.97 Pg C. This would involve the reassessment of many climatic and ecological models in order to move towards a better understanding of the adverse effects of climate change.
Submission history
From: Henry Arellano -P [view email][v1] Fri, 14 Aug 2015 21:19:29 UTC (4,756 KB)
[v2] Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:27:49 UTC (3,735 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.