Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies
[Submitted on 7 Aug 2015 (this version), latest version 5 May 2016 (v2)]
Title:The relation between star formation rate and stellar mass of galaxies at z $\sim$ 1-4
View PDFAbstract:The relation between the Star Formation Rate (SFR) and stellar mass (${\rm M}_{\star}$) of galaxies represents a fundamental constraint on galaxy formation. However, the observed amplitude of the star formation rate - stellar mass relation has not been successfully reproduced in simulations, indicating either that the halo accretion history and baryonic physics are poorly understood or that observations contain biases. In this paper, we examine the evolution of the SFR$-{\rm M}_{\star}$ relation of $z\sim 1-4 $ galaxies and display the inconsistency between observed relations that are obtained using different techniques. We employ cosmological hydrodynamic simulations from various groups and compare these with a range of observations. The comparison suggests that using Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs) to estimate star formation rates, dust corrections and stellar masses produces the most reliable SFR$-{\rm M}_{\star}$ relations. On the contrary, the combination of IR and UV luminosities (UV+IR) overpredicts the SFR and dust corrections at a fixed stellar mass almost by a factor of 5 for $z \sim 1.5-4$. For $z < 1.5$, the SED fitting technique and IR+UV conversion agree well. We find remarkable agreement between the numerical results from various authors who have employed different cosmological codes and run simulations with different resolutions. This is interesting for two reasons. A) simulations can produce realistic populations of galaxies within representative cosmological volumes even at relatively modest resolutions. B) It is likely that current numerical codes that rely on similar subgrid multiphase ISM models and are tuned to reproduce statistical properties of galaxies, produce similar results for the SFR$-{\rm M}_{\star}$ relation by construction, regardless of resolution, box size and, to some extent, the adopted feedback prescriptions.
Submission history
From: Antonios Katsianis [view email][v1] Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:23:32 UTC (261 KB)
[v2] Thu, 5 May 2016 15:35:17 UTC (268 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.