Physics > Instrumentation and Detectors
[Submitted on 2 Jul 2015 (v1), revised 13 Nov 2015 (this version, v2), latest version 15 Apr 2016 (v3)]
Title:Initial PET Performance Evaluation of a Preclinical Insert for PET/MRI with Digital SiPM Technology
View PDFAbstract:Hyperion-IID is a positron emission tomography (PET) insert which allows simultaneous operation in a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. To read out the scintillation light of the employed LYSO crystal arrays with a pitch of 1 mm pitch and 12 mm in height, digital silicon photomultipliers (DPC 3200-22, Philips Digital Photon Counting) (DPC) are used. The basic PET performance in terms of energy resolution, coincidence resolution time (CRT) and sensitivity as a function of operating parameters, such as the operating temperature, the applied overvoltage, activity and configuration parameters of the DPCs, were evaluated on system level. The measured energy resolution did not show a large dependency on the selected parameters and is in the range of 12.4-12.9% for low activities and degrades to ~13.6% at activities of ~100 MBq. The CRT strongly depends on the selected trigger scheme (trig) of the DPCs. We measured approximately 260 ps, 440 ps, 540 ps and 1300 ps for trig 1-4, respectively. The trues sensitivity for a NEMA NU 4 mouse-sized scatter phantom with a 70-mm-long tube of activity was dependent on the operating parameters and was determined to be 0.4-1.4% at low activities. The random fraction stayed below 5% at activities up to 100 MBq and the scatter fraction was evaluated as ~6% for an energy window of 411-561 keV and ~16% for 250-625 keV. Furthermore, we performed imaging experiments using a mouse-sized hot-rod phantom and a large rabbit-sized phantom. In 2D slices of the reconstructed mouse-sized hot-rod phantom (Ø = 28 mm), the rods were distinguishable from each other down to a rod size of 0.8 mm. There was no benefit of the better CRT of trig 1 over trig 3, where in the larger rabbit-sized phantom (Ø = 114 mm), we could show a clear improvement of image quality using the time-of-flight information.
Submission history
From: David Schug [view email][v1] Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:52:29 UTC (3,163 KB)
[v2] Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:29:15 UTC (5,481 KB)
[v3] Fri, 15 Apr 2016 07:18:46 UTC (4,518 KB)
Current browse context:
physics.ins-det
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.