Nuclear Experiment
[Submitted on 1 May 2015]
Title:Cross sections of $α$-induced reactions for targets with masses $A \approx 20-50$ at low energies
View PDFAbstract:A simple reduction scheme using so-called reduced energies $E_{\rm{red}}$ and reduced cross sections $\sigma_{\rm{red}}$ allows the comparison of heavy-ion induced reaction cross sections for a broad range of masses of projectile and target and over a wide energy range. A global behavior has been found for strongly bound projectiles whereas much larger reduced cross sections have been observed for weakly bound and halo projectiles. It has been shown that this simple reduction scheme works also well for $\alpha$-particle induced reactions on heavy target nuclei, but very recently significant deviations have been seen for $\alpha$+$^{33}$S and $\alpha$+$^{23}$Na. Motivated by these unexpected discrepancies, the present study analyses $\alpha$-induced reaction cross sections for targets with masses $A \approx 20-50$. The study shows that the experimental data for $\alpha$-induced reactions on nuclei with $A \approx 20-50$ deviate slightly from the global behavior of reduced cross sections. However, in general the deviations evolve smoothly towards lower masses. The only significant outliers are the recent data for $^{33}$S and $^{23}$Na which are far above the general systematics, and some very old data may indicate that $^{36}$Ar and $^{40}$Ar are below the general trend. As expected, also the doubly-magic $^{40}$Ca nucleus lies slightly below the results for its neighboring nuclei. Overall, the experimental data are nicely reproduced by a statistical model calculation utilizing the simple $\alpha$-nucleus potential by McFadden and Satchler. Simultaneously with the deviation of reduced cross sections $\sigma_{\rm{red}}$ from the general behavior, the outliers $^{23}$Na, $^{33}$S, $^{36}$Ar, and $^{40}$Ar also show significant disagreement between experiment and statistical model calculation.
Current browse context:
nucl-ex
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.