Quantitative Finance > Economics
[Submitted on 18 Feb 2015 (this version), latest version 3 Mar 2017 (v2)]
Title:One-Shot Bargaining Mechanisms
View PDFAbstract:We consider the situation that two players have cardinal preferences over a finite set of alternatives. These preferences are common knowledge to the players, and they engage in bargaining to choose an alternative. In this they are assisted by an arbitrator (a mechanism) who does not know the preferences.
Our main positive result suggests a satisfactory-alternatives mechanism wherein each player reports a set of alternatives. If the sets intersect, then the mechanism chooses an alternative from the intersection uniformly at random. If the sets are disjoint, then the mechanism chooses an alternative from the union uniformly at random. We show that a close variant of this mechanism succeeds in selecting Pareto efficient alternatives only, as pure Nash equilibria outcomes.
Then we characterize the possible and the impossible with respect to the classical bargaining axioms. Namely, we characterize the subsets of axioms can be satisfied simultaneously by the set of pure Nash equilibria outcomes of a mechanism. We provide a complete answer to this question for all subsets of axioms. In all cases that the answer is positive, we present a simple and intuitive mechanism which achieves this goal. The satisfactory-alternatives mechanism constitutes a positive answer to one of these possibility cases (arguably the most interesting case). Our negative results exclude the possibility of an efficient mechanism with unique equilibrium outcome, and exclude the possibility of an efficient symmetric mechanism which is invariant with respect to repetition of alternatives.
Submission history
From: Yakov Babichenko [view email][v1] Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:18:24 UTC (169 KB)
[v2] Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:31:47 UTC (166 KB)
Current browse context:
econ.GN
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.