Statistics > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 2 Dec 2014 (this version), latest version 18 May 2015 (v2)]
Title:Extraction of Pharmacokinetic Evidence of Drug-drug Interactions from the Literature
View PDFAbstract:Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are major causes of morbidity and mortality and a subject of intense scientific interest. Biomedical literature mining can aid DDI research by extracting evidence for large numbers of potential interactions from published literature and clinical databases. While evidence for DDI ranges in scale from intracellular biochemistry to human populations, literature mining methods have not been used to extract specific types of experimental evidence which are reported differently for distinct experimental goals. We focus on pharmacokinetic evidence for DDIs ... We used a manually curated corpus of PubMed abstracts and annotated sentences to evaluate the efficacy of literature mining in classifying PubMed abstracts containing pharmacokinetic evidence for DDIs, as well as extracting sentences containing such evidence. We implemented a text mining pipeline using several linear classifiers and a variety of feature transformation methods. The most important textual features in the abstract and sentence classification tasks were analyzed. We also investigated the performance benefits of using features derived from PubMed metadata fields, from various publicly-available named entity recognizers and from pharmacokinetic dictionaries. Several classifiers performed very well in distinguishing relevant and irrelevant abstracts (reaching F1 ~= 0.93, MCC ~= 0.74, iAUC ~= 0.99) and sentences (F1 ~= 0.76, MCC ~= 0.65, iAUC ~= 0.83). We found that word-bigram textual features were important for achieving optimal classifier performance, that features derived from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms significantly improved abstract classification, and that some drug-related entity named recognition tools and dictionaries led to slight but significant improvements, especially in classification of evidence sentences. ...
Submission history
From: Artemy Kolchinsky [view email][v1] Tue, 2 Dec 2014 00:01:39 UTC (967 KB)
[v2] Mon, 18 May 2015 16:45:42 UTC (621 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ML
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.