Quantitative Biology > Populations and Evolution
[Submitted on 20 Oct 2014 (v1), last revised 18 Aug 2015 (this version, v2)]
Title:Conflation of short identity-by-descent segments bias their inferred length distribution
View PDFAbstract:Identity-by-descent (IBD) is a fundamental concept in genetics with many applications. In a common definition, two haplotypes are said to contain an IBD segment if they share a segment that is inherited from a recent shared common ancestor without intervening recombination. Long IBD segments (> 1cM) can be efficiently detected by a number of algorithms using high-density SNP array data from a population sample. However, these approaches detect IBD based on contiguous segments of identity-by-state, and such segments may exist due to the conflation of smaller, nearby IBD segments. We quantified this effect using coalescent simulations, finding that nearly 40% of inferred segments 1-2cM long are results of conflations of two or more shorter segments, under demographic scenarios typical for modern humans. This biases the inferred IBD segment length distribution, and so can affect downstream inferences. We observed this conflation effect universally across different IBD detection programs and human demographic histories, and found inference of segments longer than 2cM to be much more reliable (less than 5% conflation rate). As an example of how this can negatively affect downstream analyses, we present and analyze a novel estimator of the de novo mutation rate using IBD segments, and demonstrate that the biased length distribution of the IBD segments due to conflation can lead to inflated estimates if the conflation is not modeled. Understanding the conflation effect in detail will make its correction in future methods more tractable.
Submission history
From: Charleston Chiang [view email][v1] Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:25:19 UTC (835 KB)
[v2] Tue, 18 Aug 2015 01:58:51 UTC (608 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.