Quantitative Biology > Genomics
[Submitted on 26 Dec 2013 (this version), latest version 11 Feb 2014 (v4)]
Title:The shrinking human protein coding complement: are there fewer than 20,000 genes?
View PDFAbstract:The determination of whether a gene is protein coding or not is a key goal of genome annotation projects. Peptide mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for detecting cellular expression of proteins and therefore is an attractive approach for verifying the protein coding potential of genes. However, a range of technical difficulties limit the coverage from proteomics experiments, with the highest recorded coverage of the human proteome being approximately 50% of human genes. Here we map the peptides detected in 7 large-scale proteomics studies to the GENCODE v12 annotation of the human genome and identify almost 60% of the protein coding genes. We find that there are surprisingly strong correlations between peptide detection and cross-species conservation, gene age and the presence of protein-like features. The age of the gene and its conservation across vertebrate species are key indicators of whether a peptide will be detected in proteomics experiments. We find peptides for most highly conserved genes and for practically all genes that evolved before bilateria. At the same time there is little or no evidence for protein expression for genes that have appeared since primates or that do not have any protein-like features or conservation. Based on our results we describe a set of 2,001 genes that have no protein features and poor conservation, or have ambiguous annotations in gene or protein databases. We suggest that many of the genes that lack supporting evidence and that are not detected in proteomics experiments, do not code for proteins under normal circumstances and that they should not be included in the human protein coding gene catalogue.
Submission history
From: Michael Tress [view email][v1] Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:22:23 UTC (1,527 KB)
[v2] Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:20:56 UTC (1,541 KB)
[v3] Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:59:37 UTC (1,645 KB)
[v4] Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:23:44 UTC (1,645 KB)
Current browse context:
q-bio.GN
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.