Computer Science > Social and Information Networks
[Submitted on 29 Oct 2013 (v1), revised 15 Apr 2015 (this version, v5), latest version 29 Oct 2017 (v15)]
Title:Stability in human interaction networks: primitive typology of vertex, prominence of measures and activity statistics
View PDFAbstract:This article reports interaction networks stability by means of three quantitative criteria: activity distribution in time and among participants; a sound classification of vertices in peripheral, intermediary and hub sectors; the combination of basic measures into principal components with greater variance.
We analyzed the temporal activity and topology evolution of networks in four email lists by considering window sizes from 50 to 10,000 messages, which were made to slide to generate snapshots of the network along a timeline. Activity in terms of seconds and minutes exhibit an uniform pattern, while hours, days and months exhibit stable concentrations.
Participant activity follows the expected distribution of scale-free networks.
We compare these networks to Erdös-Rényi networks in order to assign members to three distinct sectors, namely hubs, intermediary and periphery.
Approximately 5\% of the vertices are hubs, 15-35\% are intermediary and the remainder belongs periphery.
The metrics that most contribute to data dispersion were found to be centrality-related (degree, strength and betweenness), followed by symmetry-related, and then clustering coefficient.
The results also embrace a sketch of a physics-based typology of agents, with proper social and psychological speculations.
Because the network properties reported did not depend on the email list and were stable over time, and because observed structure is in accordance with expectations driven from literature for human interaction networks, we believe that the properties observed are also present in general human interaction networks.
Current unfoldings include governance and accountability proposals and implementations, anthropological physics experiments, audiovisual reconnaissance, and the report of quantitative differences of textual production as connectivity of agents changes.
Submission history
From: Renato Fabbri [view email][v1] Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:59:38 UTC (2,422 KB)
[v2] Sun, 28 Dec 2014 08:56:10 UTC (6,414 KB)
[v3] Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:58:33 UTC (6,413 KB)
[v4] Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:29:42 UTC (6,463 KB)
[v5] Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:16:53 UTC (6,038 KB)
[v6] Wed, 3 Jun 2015 22:52:38 UTC (4,026 KB)
[v7] Mon, 22 Jun 2015 23:03:41 UTC (4,045 KB)
[v8] Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:01:45 UTC (4,046 KB)
[v9] Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:00:59 UTC (4,046 KB)
[v10] Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:58:33 UTC (4,046 KB)
[v11] Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:45:54 UTC (4,036 KB)
[v12] Mon, 2 Nov 2015 20:10:00 UTC (4,235 KB)
[v13] Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:55:01 UTC (4,262 KB)
[v14] Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:59:27 UTC (3,936 KB)
[v15] Sun, 29 Oct 2017 02:00:33 UTC (9,219 KB)
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.