Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 10 Jul 2013 (this version), latest version 27 Feb 2015 (v3)]
Title:Estimating Workplace Contact Networks, Adjusting for Reporting Errors
View PDFAbstract:Face-to-face social contacts are deemed to be avenues of transmission for diseases such as influenza, and estimating the network of contacts can improve our understanding of disease transmission and our ability to design effective interventions. Homes, schools, and workplaces are key contact settings for infectious disease transmission, but few studies have collected workplace contact data and estimated workplace contact networks. Many epidemic models rely on the standard "random mixing" assumption to approximate workplace contact behavior: people within mixing groups contact all others with equal probability. We use contact diaries, architectural distance measures, and institutional roles and structures to estimate social contact networks within one workplace, a Swiss research institute. Inconsistencies in contact reports shed light into the extent of unreported contacts, allowing us to quantify measurement error. We use a latent variable model to jointly estimate the true (unobserved) network of contacts as well as duration-specific reporting probabilities. Our contact network has valued edges, since respondents reported contact duration. We represent the network of contact durations with a proportional odds model, allowing us to estimate probabilities of different duration categories of contact based on individual and dyadic attributes. We find that contact probability decreases with distance, and research group membership, role, and shared projects are strongly predictive of contact patterns. Estimated reporting probabilities were high (93-100%) for contacts longer than 5 minutes, but only 53% for 0-5 minute contacts. The adjustment for reporting error in our model changes the estimate of the duration distribution from a model with no such adjustment, but does not change the estimates of covariate effects.
Submission history
From: Gail Potter [view email][v1] Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:17:22 UTC (254 KB)
[v2] Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:58:50 UTC (288 KB)
[v3] Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:01:48 UTC (324 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.