Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 20 May 2013 (this version), latest version 18 Oct 2013 (v3)]
Title:Robustness of the Random Forest-based gene selection methods
View PDFAbstract:Gene selection is an important aim of a microarray data analysis, as it can reveal information leading to a better understanding of the mechanisms of the investigated phenomenon. On the same time it is a very hard task due to the noisy nature of this data, becoming extreme if one wants to identify non-obviously relevant genes which subtle impact lies near the level of noise. To this end, it is often approached through machine learning; in particular with the Random Forest method which has several features crucial for this purpose. In this work, four state-of-art Random Forest-based feature selection methods are compared; the analysis is focused on the stability of selection, as it is a necessity for the significance of the results, yet it is often ignored in similar studies.
The comparison of accuracy obtained by classifiers trained on a selected subsets of genes revealed that none of the investigated methods significantly improved the classification and majority of them did not degraded it either. Out of all analysed methods, the Boruta algorithm proved to find most possibly important genes on the same time achieving highest signal-to-noise ratio; those results were also fairly stable with respect to the used importance source. Although it was also the most computationally intensive method, its demand could be reduced to the level comparable with other analysed method by replacing the Random Forest importance with this produced by Random Ferns, a similar but simplified algorithm.
Submission history
From: Miron Kursa [view email][v1] Mon, 20 May 2013 13:39:03 UTC (12 KB)
[v2] Fri, 27 Sep 2013 23:12:50 UTC (44 KB)
[v3] Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:30:45 UTC (44 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.LG
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.