Quantitative Biology > Populations and Evolution
[Submitted on 6 May 2013]
Title:Estimating Interaction Strengths with Correlations in Annual Relative Weight: Interspecific Competition and Predation in Fishes, Pueblo Reservoir, Colorado
View PDFAbstract:Quantifying interaction strength between species is of interest in food web studies for understanding population dynamics. Theory has run ahead of experiment in solving equations describing ecological systems (the Lotka-Volterra equations, for example). Modeling approaches depend upon quantitative knowledge of interaction strengths among species, yet there are few methods available for estimating strengths of interactions between species, especially in the field. Competition and predation in fishes is traditionally studied with a variety of methods, most requiring extensive sampling to determine stock densities or extensive stomach content or isotope analysis. Average relative weight of fish species in an ecosystem can usually be accurately determined with much smaller sample sizes than required for accurate determination of stock densities. Correlations of mean annual relative weights may be used to test hypotheses and establish interaction strengths regarding competition and predation among fishes. The trends are sufficiently suggestive to use a strong positive correlation as supporting evidence of competition and possibly indicative of the magnitude of competition if other evidence such as analysis of stomach contents is also present. Likewise, a strong negative correlation might be interpreted as relevant when forming a hypothesis of predation and as supporting evidence of the magnitude of predation if other evidence is also present. In systems where regular weight and length survey data are available, this method can suggest the likely strength of competitive and predatory relationships and may be more cost effective than stomach content or isotope analysis.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.