Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 25 Apr 2013 (v1), last revised 2 Jul 2018 (this version, v5)]
Title:Inference on a Distribution Function from Ranked Set Samples
View PDFAbstract:Consider independent observations $(X_1,R_1)$, $(X_2,R_2)$, \ldots, $(X_n,R_n)$ with random or fixed ranks $R_i \in \{1,2,\ldots,k\}$, while conditional on $R_i = r$, the random variable $X_i$ has the same distribution as the $r$-th order statistic within a random sample of size $k$ from an unknown continuous distribution function $F$. Such observation schemes are utilized in situations in which ranking observations is much easier than obtaining their precise values. Two well-known special cases are ranked set sampling (McIntyre 1952) and judgement post-stratification (MacEachern et al. 2004).
Within a general setting including unbalanced ranked set sampling we derive and compare the asymptotic distributions of three different estimators of the distribution function $F$ as $n \to \infty$ with fixed $k$: The stratified estimator of Stokes and Sager (1988), the nonparametric maximum-likelihood estimator of Kvam and Samaniego (1994) and a moment-based estimator of Chen (2001). Our functional central limit theorems generalize and refine previous asymptotic analyses. In addition we discuss briefly pointwise and simultaneous confidence intervals for the distribution function $F$ with guaranteed coverage probability for finite sample sizes.
The methods are illustrated with a real data example, and the potential impact of imperfect rankings is investigated in a small simulation experiment. All in all, the moment-based estimator seems to offer a good compromise between efficiency and robustness versus imperfect ranking, in addition to computational efficiency.
Submission history
From: Lutz Duembgen [view email][v1] Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:06:00 UTC (495 KB)
[v2] Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:21:54 UTC (495 KB)
[v3] Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:05:55 UTC (1,101 KB)
[v4] Fri, 9 Dec 2016 13:23:42 UTC (1,040 KB)
[v5] Mon, 2 Jul 2018 13:25:52 UTC (2,729 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.