Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods
[Submitted on 29 Jan 2013 (v1), revised 8 Mar 2013 (this version, v3), latest version 5 Feb 2014 (v5)]
Title:Exact hybrid particle/population simulation of rule-based models of biochemical systems
View PDFAbstract:Network-based approaches to modeling and simulating biochemical reaction systems, such as ordinary differential equations, require enumerating all possible species and reactions that can potentially exist in a system. The applicability of these approaches is limited, however, by the problem of combinatorial complexity, an explosion in the number of species and reactions due to protein-protein interactions prevalent in biochemical systems. Rule-based modeling is an approach that avoids this problem by representing molecules as structured objects and encoding their interactions as pattern-based rules. Rule-based models can, on the one hand, be used to generate fully enumerated reaction networks or, alternatively, simulated directly using particle-based kinetic Monte Carlo methods. The latter "network-free" approach produces exact stochastic trajectories with a computational cost that is independent of network size. However, memory and run time costs increase linearly (at best) with the number of particles, limiting the size of system that can be feasibly simulated. Here, we present a hybrid particle/population simulation method that combines the best attributes of both the network-based and network-free approaches. The method takes as input a rule-based model augmented with a user-specified subset of species to treat as population variables rather than as particles. The model is then transformed by a process of partial network expansion into a form that can be simulated using a population-adapted network-free simulator. We have implemented the transformation method within the open-source rule-based modeling platform BioNetGen and the resulting hybrid model can be simulated using the particle-based simulator NFsim. Benchmark tests show that significant memory savings can be achieved using the new approach and a monetary cost analysis provides a practical measure of its utility.
Submission history
From: Leonard Harris [view email][v1] Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:50:56 UTC (1,036 KB)
[v2] Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:10:26 UTC (1,456 KB)
[v3] Fri, 8 Mar 2013 07:55:36 UTC (1,509 KB)
[v4] Sat, 9 Nov 2013 02:19:42 UTC (1,185 KB)
[v5] Wed, 5 Feb 2014 02:07:48 UTC (1,187 KB)
Ancillary-file links:
Ancillary files (details):
Current browse context:
q-bio.QM
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.