Quantitative Biology > Genomics
[Submitted on 9 Jan 2013 (this version), latest version 4 Apr 2013 (v4)]
Title:Biases in the Experimental Annotations of Protein Function and their Effect on Our Understanding of Protein Function Space
View PDFAbstract:The ongoing functional annotation of proteins relies upon the work of curators to capture experimental findings from scientific literature and apply them to protein sequence and structure data. However, with the increasing use of high-throughput experimental assays, a small number of experimental studies dominate the functional protein annotations collected in databases. Here we investigate just how prevalent is the "few articles - many proteins" phenomenon. We examine the annotation of UniProtKB by the Gene Ontology Annotation project, and show that the distribution of proteins per published study is exponential, with 0.14% of articles annotating 25% of the proteins in UniProt-GOA. Since each of the dominant articles describes the use of an assay that can find only one function or a small group of functions, this leads to substantial biases in what we know about the function of many proteins. Mass-spectrometry, microscopy and RNAi experiments dominate high throughput experiments. Consequently, the functional information derived from these experiments is mostly of the subcellular location of proteins, and for participation in embryonic developmental pathways. For some organisms, the information provided by different studies overlap by a large amount. We also show that the information provided by high throughput experiments is less specific than those provided by low throughput experiments. Given the experimental techniques available, certain biases in protein function annotation Given the experimental techniques available, certain biases in protein function annotation due to high-throughput experiments are unavoidable. Knowing that these biases exist and understanding their characteristics and extent is important for database curators, developers of function annotation programs, and anyone who uses protein function annotation data to plan experiments.
Submission history
From: Iddo Friedberg [view email][v1] Wed, 9 Jan 2013 02:48:22 UTC (859 KB)
[v2] Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:45:00 UTC (859 KB)
[v3] Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:38:44 UTC (859 KB)
[v4] Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:50:31 UTC (858 KB)
Current browse context:
q-bio.GN
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.