Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

arXiv:1211.1154 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Nov 2012]

Title:The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000

Authors:Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
View PDF
Abstract:The data of F1000 provide us with the unique opportunity to investigate the relationship between peers' ratings and bibliometric metrics on a broad and comprehensive data set with high-quality ratings. F1000 is a post-publication peer review system of the biomedical literature. The comparison of metrics with peer evaluation has been widely acknowledged as a way of validating metrics. Based on the seven indicators offered by InCites, we analyzed the validity of raw citation counts (Times Cited, 2nd Generation Citations, and 2nd Generation Citations per Citing Document), normalized indicators (Journal Actual/Expected Citations, Category Actual/Expected Citations, and Percentile in Subject Area), and a journal based indicator (Journal Impact Factor). The data set consists of 125 papers published in 2008 and belonging to the subject category cell biology or immunology. As the results show, Percentile in Subject Area achieves the highest correlation with F1000 ratings; we can assert that for further three other indicators (Times Cited, 2nd Generation Citations, and Category Actual/Expected Citations) the 'true' correlation with the ratings reaches at least a medium effect size.
Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:1211.1154 [cs.DL]
  (or arXiv:1211.1154v1 [cs.DL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1211.1154

Submission history

From: Lutz Bornmann Dr. [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:25:31 UTC (265 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.DL
stat

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Lutz Bornmann
Loet Leydesdorff
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)