Quantitative Biology > Populations and Evolution
[Submitted on 10 Sep 2012 (v1), last revised 12 Sep 2012 (this version, v2)]
Title:The composite theory as the explanation of Haldane's rule should be abandoned
View PDFAbstract:In 1922, JBS Haldane discovered an intriguing bias of postzygotic isolation during early speciation: the heterogametic sex of F1 hybrids between closely related species or subspecies is more susceptible to sterility or inviability than the homogametic sex. This phenomenon, now known as Haldane's rule, has been repeatedly confirmed across broad taxa in diecious animals and plants. Currently, the dominant view in the field of speciation genetics believes that Haldane's rule for sterility, inviability, male heterogamety and female heterogametic belongs to different entities; and Haldane's rule in these subdivisions has different causes, which operate coincidentally and/or collectively resulting in this striking bias against the heterogametic sex in hybridization. This view, known as the composite theory, was developed after many unsuccessful quests in searching for a unitary genetic mechanism. The composite theory has multiple sub-theories. The dominance theory and the faster male theory are the major ones. In this note, I challenge the composite theory and its scientific validity. By declaring Haldane's rule as a composite phenomenon caused by multiple mechanisms coincidentally/collectively, the composite theory becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy and untestable. I believe that the composite theory is an ad hoc hypothesis that lacks falsifiability, refutability and testability that a scientific theory requires. It is my belief that the composite theory does not provide meaningful insights for the study of speciation and should be abandoned.
Submission history
From: Renxue Wang [view email][v1] Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:48:54 UTC (43 KB)
[v2] Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:59:18 UTC (44 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.