Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition

arXiv:1203.3954 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 18 Mar 2012 (v1), last revised 24 Mar 2012 (this version, v2)]

Title:Gender differences in time perception and its relation with academic performance: non-linear dynamics in the formation of cognitive systems

Authors:Klaus Jaffe, Guillermo Mascitti, Daniella Seguias
View PDF
Abstract:Non-linear dynamics is probably much more common in the epigenetic dynamics of living beings than hitherto recognized. Here we report a case of global bifurcation triggered by gender that affects higher cognitive functions in humans. We report a cross-cultural study showing deviations in time perception, as assessed by estimating the duration of brief sounds, according to their durations and to the gender of the perciver. Results show that the duration of sounds lasting less than 10 s were on average overestimated, whereas those lasting longer were underestimated; estimates of sounds shorter than 1 s were extremely inaccurate. Females consistently gave longer estimates than males. Accuracy in time estimation was correlated to academic performance in disciplines requiring mathematical or scientific skills in male, but not in female students. This difference in correlation however had nothing to do with overall skills in mathematics. Both sexes scored similarly in scientific and technical disciplines, but females had higher grades than males in languages and lower ones in physical education. Our results confirm existing evidence for gender differences in cognitive processing, hinting to the existence of different "mathematical intelligences" with different non-linear relationships between natural or biological mathematical intuition and time perception.
Comments: Politically incorrect paper practically impossible to publish in a psychology journal
Subjects: Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1203.3954 [q-bio.NC]
  (or arXiv:1203.3954v2 [q-bio.NC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1203.3954

Submission history

From: Klaus Jaffe Dr [view email]
[v1] Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:29:30 UTC (91 KB)
[v2] Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:57:49 UTC (90 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-03
Change to browse by:
q-bio.NC

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)