Computer Science > Computational Complexity
[Submitted on 4 Jan 2012 (v1), revised 20 Jun 2013 (this version, v4), latest version 20 Apr 2019 (v10)]
Title:Complexity Classification in Infinite-Domain Constraint Satisfaction
View PDFAbstract:A constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is a computational problem where the input consists of a finite set of variables and a finite set of constraints, and where the task is to decide whether there exists a satisfying assignment of values to the variables. Depending on the type of constraints that we allow in the input, a CSP might be tractable, or computationally hard. In recent years, general criteria have been discovered that imply that a CSP is polynomial-time tractable, or that it is NP-hard. Finite-domain CSPs have become a major common research focus of graph theory, artificial intelligence, and finite model theory. It turned out that the key questions for complexity classification of CSPs are closely linked to central questions in universal algebra.
This thesis studies CSPs where the variables can take values from an infinite domain. This generalization enhances dramatically the range of computational problems that can be modeled as a CSP. Many problems from areas that have so far seen no interaction with constraint satisfaction theory can be formulated using infinite domains, e.g. problems from temporal and spatial reasoning, phylogenetic reconstruction, and operations research.
It turns out that the universal-algebraic approach can also be applied to study large classes of infinite-domain CSPs, yielding elegant complexity classification results. A new tool in this thesis that becomes relevant particularly for infinite domains is Ramsey theory. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach with two complete complexity classification results: one on CSPs in temporal reasoning, the other on a generalization of Schaefer's theorem for propositional logic to logic over graphs. We also study the limits of complexity classification, and present classes of computational problems provably do not exhibit a complexity dichotomy into hard and easy problems.
Submission history
From: Manuel Bodirsky [view email][v1] Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:39:46 UTC (1,381 KB)
[v2] Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:21:28 UTC (1,386 KB)
[v3] Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:40:59 UTC (1,387 KB)
[v4] Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:36:07 UTC (1,390 KB)
[v5] Sat, 13 Jun 2015 06:56:24 UTC (1,697 KB)
[v6] Sat, 29 Aug 2015 06:57:29 UTC (3,624 KB)
[v7] Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:33:28 UTC (2,534 KB)
[v8] Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:41:07 UTC (2,523 KB)
[v9] Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:20:55 UTC (2,523 KB)
[v10] Sat, 20 Apr 2019 07:03:06 UTC (2,527 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.CC
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.