Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 7 Jun 2011 (v1), last revised 9 Jun 2011 (this version, v2)]
Title:Direct Measurements of the magnification produced by galaxy clusters as gravitational lenses
View PDFAbstract:Weak lensing is one of the best available diagnostic tools to measure the total density profiles of distant clusters of galaxies. Unfortunately, it suffers from the well-known mass-sheet degeneracy, so that weak lensing analyses cannot lead to fully reliable determinations of the total mass of the clusters. One possible way to set the relevant scale of the density profile would be to make a direct measurement of the magnification produced by the clusters as gravitational lenses. In this paper we revisit a suggestion made a few years ago for this general purpose, based on the use of the Fundamental Plane as a standard rod for early-type galaxies. Here we move one step further, beyond the simple outline of the idea given earlier, and quantify some statistical properties of this innovative diagnostic tool, with the final goal of identifying clear guidelines for a future observational test on concrete cases, which turns out to be well within the current instrument capabilities. The study is carried out by discussing the statistical properties of Fundamental Plane measurements for a sample of early-type source galaxies behind a massive cluster, for which a weak lensing analysis is assumed to be available. We proceed to study the best strategy to use Fundamental Plane measurements to determine the mass scale of a given cluster and find that the optimal choice is that of a sample of early-type galaxies behind the cluster distributed approximately uniformly in the sky. We also show that substructures do not contribute much to the magnification signal that we are looking for, but only add a modest amount of scatter. We find that for a massive cluster (M > 10^15 M_Sun) located at redshift 0.3 +/- 0.1, a set of about 20 Fundamental Plane measurements, combined with a good weak lensing analysis, should be able to lead to a mass determination with a precision of 20% or better.
Submission history
From: Alessandro Sonnenfeld [view email][v1] Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:04:21 UTC (129 KB)
[v2] Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:07:13 UTC (129 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.