Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 11 Mar 2010 (v1), revised 20 Apr 2010 (this version, v2), latest version 1 Mar 2012 (v3)]
Title:A nonparametric approach for relevance determination
View PDFAbstract:The objective of many high throughput studies is to identify factors that are relevant to an outcome of interest. Such studies are abundant in genetics, image processing, astrophysics, and neuroscience. In this paper, we argue that treating these problems as large-scale hypothesis tests does not reflect the motivation behind the studies. Instead, we suggest treating these studies as a decision problem, where our primary concern is selecting the most relevant set of factors for a more focused follow up. Furthermore, instead of dividing the factors into a significant and a non-significant group (which is common in the hypothesis testing framework), we propose a flexible Bayesian model that accommodates subgroups with different degrees of importance. To this end, our approach uses a simple extension of Dirichlet process mixtures to model the relationship between the factors and the outcome. With simulated data, we demonstrate that our model performs substantially better than alternative methods based on the false discovery rate. We also apply our method to two real large-scale studies. The objective of the first study is to interrogate the mutation status of p53 in cancer cell lines, and the objective of the second study is to identify differentially expressed genes between two types of leukemia. Overall, we find that taking into account the true motivation behind high throughput studies and the possible complexity of relationships between factors and outcome could improve the analysis by increasing the rate of discovering relevant factors while keeping the false discovery rate low.
Submission history
From: Babak Shahbaba [view email][v1] Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:11:09 UTC (387 KB)
[v2] Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:19:38 UTC (410 KB)
[v3] Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:18:03 UTC (345 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.