Astrophysics
[Submitted on 26 Jul 2008 (v1), last revised 31 Oct 2008 (this version, v2)]
Title:Poincare dodecahedral space parameter estimates
View PDFAbstract: We aim to improve the surface of last scattering (SLS) optimal cross-correlation method in order to refine estimates of the Poincaré dodecahedral space (PDS) cosmological parameters. We analytically derive the formulae required to exclude points on the sky that cannot be members of close SLS-SLS cross-pairs. These enable more efficient pair selection without sacrificing uniformity of the underlying selection process. In certain cases this decreases the calculation time and increases the number of pairs per separation bin. (i) We recalculate Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC) on the five-year WMAP data; and (ii) we seek PDS solutions in a small number of Gaussian random fluctuation (GRF) simulations. For 5 < alpha/deg < 60, a calculation speed-up of 3-10 is obtained. (i) The best estimates of the PDS parameters for the five-year WMAP data are similar to those for the three-year data. (ii) Comparison of the optimal solutions found by the MCMC chains in the observational map to those found in the simulated maps yields a slightly stronger rejection of the simply connected model using $\alpha$ than using the twist angle $\phi$. The best estimate of $\alpha$ implies that_given a large scale auto-correlation as weak as that observed,_ the PDS-like cross-correlation signal in the WMAP data is expected with a probability of less than about 10%. The expected distribution of $\phi$ from the GRF simulations is approximately Gaussian around zero, it is not uniform on $[-\pi,\pi]$. We infer that for an infinite, flat, cosmic concordance model with Gaussian random fluctuations, the chance of finding_both_ (a) a large scale auto-correlation as weak as that observed,_and_ (b) a PDS-like signal similar to that observed is less than about 0.015% to 1.25%.
Submission history
From: Boudewijn Roukema [view email][v1] Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:09:24 UTC (468 KB)
[v2] Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:09:43 UTC (514 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.